Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GERMAN INTEREST

PAYMENT DELAY

AN UNFAVOURABLE IMPRESSION

(United ' Press Association—By Electric Telegraph—Copyright).

LONDON, December 19

Foreign bond dealers, have strongly protested to the Committee 01 t*.e Stock Exchange against Germany’s default, severely criticising the German policy of using funds; which should go to pay imprest to buy German bonds at knockout prices in [London with a view to cancellation . The “Morning Post’’ says : The view is strongly held in the country that no i debtor has the right to , discriminate in this arbitrary fashion his creditors. The British Government has already ~ addressed , a remonstrance to Berlin, without apparent result, but they ought not to let the matter drop. “The Times’- says: The impression left by Dr 'Schact’s handling of the debt question is ’anything but favourable. It is idle to pretend that, the Beichhank and the Government are powerless to any . increase in the available supply of foreign ex- . change, for these could, without question, be stimulated-by appropriate measures.',-- Indeed-' l it seems quite clear that if they -really desired) to do so, <Dr -gcha-cht and 'the Government. could' very well continue the payments, •at least, on the present scale, without inflicting any hardships Upon- the German .people. Throughout the negotiations, Dr iSchacht 'displayed "a/iihighiharded disregard of the legitimate claims of i foreign- 'creditors, which it is difficult . to reconcile with perfect good faith, and' his .preferential treatment of the , Swiss and- Dutch claims in particular introduced an arbitrary discrirmnation which no amount'.of sophistry ( lean- justify. • . ; •' . REASON FOB GERMANY’S ACTION r ; , BERLIN, December'l9. i . The Economic Minister, - Herr - Schmitt, 1 ; ;•< addressing the new Foreign C rtun - - oil, said that the number of workers in -I the export industries had fallen from < 2,600,000 'to 1,750,000 in three years, i land the foreign trade had fallen from t £1,350,000000 '. to , £500,000,000,’ which . * stagnation . (contrasted with increased t foreign activ : i ; y, and oth6r nations’ s prosperity.’ -Germany'was prepared for r the closest economic relations with other i 1 nations who were' ■ willing'- to abandon I their gbortsiglitecl, exclusive, tariffs, be- t cause Germany 1 could ''only' pay if these t Were .her customers.' The Trade Council ar& therefore considering important tariff s taxation • proposals. [

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19331221.2.26

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 21 December 1933, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
362

GERMAN INTEREST Hokitika Guardian, 21 December 1933, Page 5

GERMAN INTEREST Hokitika Guardian, 21 December 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert