COURT OF APPEAL
Dairy suppliers’ case
(Per Press Association — Copyright.)
WELLINGTON, October 12. Tii i; "he case'- of Carroll and Keeley v. Attorney-General, before the Court of Appeal, .Mr Findlay, counsel for nopell rnt, ’ in reply submitted that even :if the Dairy Industry Acts interfered with the, terms. of contracts ol dsiivy farmers'," it in .no way del-o-s’ted rom their . general right of freodo n of contract. Any attempt to invade private rights must be - founder -bon clear wards in the'Statute. In this case the Dairy, Industry Acts RegtCations /.before the Court were net •heally based on the .'‘Statute at n,li. but. were . a piece of independent legislr tiop’ ‘ by,; ■bi'cler-ih-cJfincil: In conclusion, cbunsel risked that in-view of the-threat! of the Government to legislate;hat' the earliest.. opportunity ■ the decision of" the’ Court, if in favour of appellant, be not withheld jafter the passiug of • the legislation, Decision -was'treserved. ' A’., ‘-
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19331013.2.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 13 October 1933, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
149COURT OF APPEAL Hokitika Guardian, 13 October 1933, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in