Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MUTUAL CHARGES

TIN HARE RACING CORRUPTION

MR STEVENS AND MR LANG.

( Australian P.ess Association.)

SYDNEY, November 9.

The' Premier, Mr Stevens, to-day gave Mr Hang every facility for moving a motion of censure on the Government.

-ur bang’s motion condemned the Government for being associated with the payment of £iOUO to Redmond Garry,, who undertook to procure secret, testimony in regard to tl:e tin. hare .dealings, vvueivby former Ministers cf tbe Crown were defamed, and party advantages obta.ned. The motion claimed that such payments amounted to bribery. He declared that the Premier, Mr Stevens, and others liud entered into a conspiracy to procure by bribery false evidence whereon to denounce former Ministers cf the Crown. Air Lung reviewed at great length the negotiations with Barry, and diligent efforts bn the part of Mr Stevens to induce Barry to bring him (Mr Lang) prominently into the tin hare scandals.

The Premier, in reply, declared that Mr Lang, had made a grotesque attempt to cloak proven corruption and fraud on the part of certain members of the Lang Administration in connection with tin hare racing and the introduction of fruit machines. Could anybody doubt, asked Mr Stevens that Mr Lang, Mr Gosling and Mr Ely were involved to the fullest extent in corruption ? Mr ' Stevens created a sensation when he stated that on the eve of the 1927 State election, when the fate of tin hare racing was in the ballanee, Air Lang had received twentyfour thousand pounds into his trust account, £12,000 of which was spent c-n the election, £4,000 was transferred to J. T. Lang’s fixed deposit account, £250 to his private account and £2OOO was paid to Mr Gosling, who later became the chief secretary. The censure rnoion was defeated by 48 to 19.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19321110.2.26

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 10 November 1932, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
295

MUTUAL CHARGES Hokitika Guardian, 10 November 1932, Page 4

MUTUAL CHARGES Hokitika Guardian, 10 November 1932, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert