Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

WELLINGTON.;. CRIMINAL SESSION.; I UTTERING COUNTERFEIT GOINS. ; (Per Press Association — Copyright.) ■ WELLINGTON, October 25. i The criminal session of the Supreme • Court opened today. 'Albert ®%ry O'Malley, unemployed • barman, aged, 59, was fiiß onThe.Pst, ; wiff.i four charges of uttering counter- > feit coins. si I)etectiv e Ritchie gave evidence that l when ha interviewed O'Malley R ■ o’Malay's room, paying -h-3 had reason > to believe O’Malley had counterfeit - half-crowns ih his possession, O’Mal- ; ley replied he had had two which he ■ had passed at -a -couple of shops. • Witness produced and read a ~stßeii ment made after and signed bv 0 j\tali : ley at the detective office, in which s he said he passed the first half-crown i innocently, 'but when he parsed ■ i second he knew it was a “dud.” Th" ’ half-crowns, he said, were given h" m •by a .man who shouted him a drink in the 'lmperial Hotel bar. ■ No evidence was given for the acI cused. ! | -His Honour, Justice McGreg-r, saR ■ Fro question came down to the con- . " siderat'on of whether OAIalFy '. knew j when he passed the coins, they were' pot .genuine. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty on the first.-count, and guilty on three others. O'Malley was remanded for sentence.'.'- ' ' ' : After .the .Grand Jury had returned true bil’s in fifteen cases. presented at ■ The Supreme -Court-, sessions to-day, the Foreman said he - had been reanested to .express appreciation of the splendid way in which the polic e -had worked ‘up their cases and presented them for The Grand -Jury’s consideration, and ‘of the very -excellent work they apipepped to be doing in the matter ol ipublic ... protection. Mu Justice Mc- ; Gpegor said he had no doubt notice' would be'taken of the-'presentment,'and, ‘that it would bo appreciated in the proper quarter. , murder charge thrown out; ' AUCKLAND, October 25. At the Supreme ' Cou'irt ' the grand jury | threw out the charge of murder ; Against Hewer. They returned true ' bills in all of '.'the” .other charges against him.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19321026.2.67

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 26 October 1932, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
332

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 26 October 1932, Page 6

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 26 October 1932, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert