Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL COURT

decision reserved. (Per Press Association— Copyright.) WELLINGTON, October 5. The Appeal Court reserved its decision. to-day in the, case Alexander Mines Ltd. v: Hill and McVicar. Counsel for the appellant Company, at the dose of the (argument, said that he had been asked by the solicitors instructing him to express their regret a.t the delay in the filing of the documents, x and to explain it was due to a misunderstanding as to what documents the two defendants required to he incororated in the statement of facts. The Court accepted this explanation.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19321006.2.49

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 6 October 1932, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
94

APPEAL COURT Hokitika Guardian, 6 October 1932, Page 5

APPEAL COURT Hokitika Guardian, 6 October 1932, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert