TIN HARE INQUIRY
AN ALLEGATION OF FORGERY.
(Australian Press Association.)
SYDNEY, August 24,
The outstanding feature at the mechanical hare inquiry to-day was the - allegation by a witness named A. Potter who declared that his signature Was forged on an. agreement to sell a lease of land at Singleton for tin hare coursing in return for three thousand fully paid up shares in a coursing company. The Royal Commissioner directed the witness’ attention to the fact that his signature was witnessed by a man named Hassett, who would be liable to prosecution if the signature were a forgery.
The witness replied that the signature was faked.' He said that Hassett had not witnessed it. The hearing was adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320825.2.43
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 25 August 1932, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
118TIN HARE INQUIRY Hokitika Guardian, 25 August 1932, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in