Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LANCASTER TRIAL

COUNSEL FOR DEFENCE. A STRONG APPEAL. (United Press Association—By Electric .Telegraph—Copyright.) (Received this dav at. 12.25. p.m. • : MIAMI) August 16. -Carson closed his argument with the assertion that Clarke was an “honour suicide.” There was nothing else for him to do. ‘ ' . ‘My client did. not shoot him. Clarke was broke. He was a drinker who had had to leave liquor alone. He was a ■narcotic addict, he had trouble with women, he had a. recurring illness to tear ■ down 'his stamina. 'Was that not enough to make any • man commit suicide,” Carson asked. r xi

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320817.2.58

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 17 August 1932, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
97

LANCASTER TRIAL Hokitika Guardian, 17 August 1932, Page 6

LANCASTER TRIAL Hokitika Guardian, 17 August 1932, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert