Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FALSE PRETENCES

BOOKMAKING VENTUBE,

(By Telegraph — Pt. Press Association)

AUCKLAND, May 5. 1 Philip Fielding Farmvorth stood his 1 trial yesterday on a charge of obtain- - ing £2O by false pretences from l Charles Suthers Lees, a waterside 1 worker. It was- alleged that lie ob--1 t.iinod tlie money by representing that * it would be handed to detective officers * to ensure immunity from being raided ; when Leee set up with him in business as a bookmaker. Lees, now a waterside worker and * formerly a land agent, described a meeting with Famworth when it was suggested that he (witness) should go into the bookmaking business: Witness took an office for six weeks. Farmvorth said it would be a good idea to get £2O to “square” . the detectives. He said he had been in the force six and a half years and knew tlie ropes and could bribe the police to protect them from interference. He mentioned De-tective-Sergeant McHugh and Detec-tive-Sergeant Doyle . Counsel: How did he refer to them ? W itness: He called McHugh “Mr” and Mr Doyle “Paddy” (laughter). J " itness ch ew money from the Post Office Savings Bank and handed it j over.. He understood that to be “fifty-fifty”.- between the two officers. Mi* Justice Herdrnan asked: Did you make, any money?—“No, but I lost j some (laughter). It cost me £3O in all.” j And'what happened to the business? It, was mostly “on the nod.” Not | much cash, sir (laughter). Oouncel for the accused: I suppose ; you realise it was an illegal transaction P—Yes. j You as a land agent and also as a waterside worker had some knowledge of. the world ?—Yes, and I have a. bit more now (laughter). The witness said that a couple of days after giving him the £2O Farn- | worth said: “[ spoke to the detectives and made things all right. One of J them said it was a miserable present.” Farnworth’s counsel referred to the case as paltry. The chief witness i against Farn\vorth had' been in partnership in an illegal business with him. The jury, after a brief retirement, ] returned with a verdict of guilty and j Farmvorth was remanded for sentence. j '(

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320506.2.52

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 6 May 1932, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
362

FALSE PRETENCES Hokitika Guardian, 6 May 1932, Page 6

FALSE PRETENCES Hokitika Guardian, 6 May 1932, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert