Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANOTHER REPLY.

(Tii llie Kililor.) "dr, Vniir i chti'siiihiili'lil '*i' ll S ; 1 1 * ’ ’ e'ives till l newly In'lin'd Ifate- | in vers' Association ‘-Treat iledil 111 lII' ill”' alile l,u depose their town r>‘|> 1 *■ -.ell | ;i | i vis. I, id lls hope litis will he realised. This movement deserves fill' si'pport of all ratepayers for if means i 101 l united we stand div ided ue full. The lain;.* lid; come, ill OHJ upiliioli

| when South Westland Riding needs its own members. No doubt as your correspondent says, the matter of Peter-

sen’s Road has made us realise this

more. But it is also a definite forward step on the part of the settlers to have no more absentee representatives. No i doubt they have done their best Imt we are sure that our own members' can do better. Your correspondent says that this is not British fair play, which sounds rather like clap trap, but it , seems to us rather like sound British I common sense to put up onr own candidate and vote for him. We are rei l'errcd to as a “few” disgruntled settlors, but these same “few” have sent j two petitions to the Council signed by |4O and more ratepayers, pra^io"l ! y j every settler in the particular 'jp-l'ii t | concerned. The- Council di' s .”osesf.'4-dlv ! of theg|j'etitions. hut they will not dispose bP-tour “few” votes so easily Does your correspondent consider-, it British fair play to keep a settler wafting ten years for a road to his.farhi, at the whim of another settlor. Tf is 1 aitninst such inmstice that our Association wish to fight.

We, ik ratepayers, do not agree that -it is undue extravagance to pay a man con a year to see to our needs ft is our money and we do not begrudge it In fact it is not a large sum for the sacrifices made by the members and we .are convinced that Iho results will well re-pay the outlay. Would than the memebrs of (lie last Council bad b" >n as economically minded when spend ing onr money on surveys and re-sur-veys of Petersen’s Road, to say nothing of travelling expenses of County members to the scene of the argument, and two visits of the Department’s Chie” Engineer. We. as large and probably larger ratepayers,, wish ta see our money better spent, and trust that Riding Ratepayers will see to it on election day. 1 am etc..

P. S. HANSEN. Chairman, County Ratepayers’ Assn Harihari, South Westland.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320430.2.8.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 30 April 1932, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
420

ANOTHER REPLY. Hokitika Guardian, 30 April 1932, Page 3

ANOTHER REPLY. Hokitika Guardian, 30 April 1932, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert