Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ELECTION COURT

A BOMBSHELL FALLS,

(By Telegraph — ter tress Association)

MARTON, April 19.

A bombshell fell on the Election Court when it resumed this morning, when, with one exception, the charges of corrupt practice on the part of Alexander Stuart were withdrawn »y counsel for the petitioner, James Thomas Hogan.

The only case which remained was a charge that John Fyfe, an engine driver at Marten Junction, alter being compulsorily retired, was reinstated on Stuart’s representations.

Fyfe, in evidence, denied-.that tlie respondent had done anything more than give him a letter of introduction to Hon. Coates. The political leanings of witness were questioned, and lie admitted that lie had “certain sympathies with the Labour Party. Ho supported Stuart, however, because lie con.sdered him to be a -suitable man to represent the district in Parliament. “He turned a political somersault,” said counsel, to which the Chief Justice replied: “That is nothing. Plenty of people do that, and they are entitled to. This is a serious charge and we want something more than that.”

The remainder of the morning was taken up hearing A. M ay and F. Marlow. It was alleged they were paid organisers of Stuart and exercised their votes. W;ay admitted that he was paid as secretary by the Marten branch of the Reform Party, but when the Coalition was formed, the branch went out of existence and Way became honorary secretary to the Coalition Committee receiving no remunera-

tion. Marlow denied receiving payment

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19320419.2.59

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 19 April 1932, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
245

ELECTION COURT Hokitika Guardian, 19 April 1932, Page 6

ELECTION COURT Hokitika Guardian, 19 April 1932, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert