Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COUNTRY AND TOWN.

(To the Editor). Sir.—lt appears from a statement made by the Hon. A. H. McLeod at a meeting of farmers in the Wairarapa | district the other day that lie looks with suspicion upon both “fusion” and “coalition” in their relation to politics. He knew many people, particuI larly in the cities, so he told his audience, who honestly favour fusion, but he had no hesitation in saying these ' folk have not the remotest knowledge of the political psychology of the farm- < qrs. There are many among.us, it I; must be contested, who are not fam- n iliar with the psychology of the fanners, political or otherwise, and we should be pleased to have Mr McLeod’s enlightennfeht upon so interesting a subject. Meanwhile Mr McLeod has let us know that fusion and coalition are entirely different matters,” fusion being a permanent amalgamation, while coalition is but a temporary expedient such as the one which exist, ed between the Reform; Government and the Liberal Opposition during the Great War. - 1

“In Australia, following the termination of the war,” Mr McLeod emphasises, “in both the Commonwealth and the States, war-time Coalition Governments carried on as fused Governments, In every instance this was immediately followed by the growth and formation oi the Country Party and the placing of Labour in office at a more or less early date. The plain truth is that in New Zeal and > no more than in Australia:, do farmers accept city motives as being altruistic.” Mr McLeod already has -been corrected in his wild assertion concerning the appearance of Labour in. office in Australia. Labour’s attainment of office in the Commonwealth had nothing whatever to do with either fusion or coalition, and it is little short of an outrage to imply, with a sneer, that the farmers as a • body in . this country do not “taccept city motives as being altruistic.” For. fifty years- or thereabout the urban and suburban electors have conceded an. advantage of 28.'per cent' to rural electors in parliamentary representation, to.Jsay. nothing of other , advantages that have been readily conceded to farmers by the State. And yet Mr -McLeod thinks the time opportune to , cast doubts upon the sincerity of the fanners’ best friends! Surely this is not the kind of electioneering that will furnish the Dominion with a Parliament capable of speedily extricating it from the difficulties by which it is beset. v .] I am, ‘ HOPEFUL. Wellington, August 13th. ’ •

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19310817.2.50.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 17 August 1931, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
408

COUNTRY AND TOWN. Hokitika Guardian, 17 August 1931, Page 5

COUNTRY AND TOWN. Hokitika Guardian, 17 August 1931, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert