BREACH OF PROMISE
UNUSUAL CASE. (By Telegraph —Per Tress Association) WELLINGTON. June 11. Alleging an agreement -to marry had been arranged by correspondence, but that defendant had refused to carry' out the obligation on her arrival from Johannesburg, Chaia Zak, a Polish girl, claimed £92 special and £75 general damages, from a draper, Rosenthal, of Wellington, for breach of promise. On her arrival it was stated, defendant told her that he had another girl. Rosenthal claims that there was no, promise to marry, but that there was to be a marriage if they both wished nftey a meeting, and he claims there was a mutual agreement not to marry.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19310612.2.33
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 12 June 1931, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
109BREACH OF PROMISE Hokitika Guardian, 12 June 1931, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in