Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BLOCKED BY FARMERS

FATE OF THE I.C. AND A. BILL A reference to the Industrial C'onciliat on and Arbitration Bill, which was dropped l>v the Government last session in spite of strong Labour protests, was made by the Min.ster of Labour, the don. h. G. Smith, in a post-sessional address to his constituents last week. The Min ster said be had been much abused over the matter, but lie assert’d that he was innocent of any attempt to foist a bill on to Parliament which would create harm to any section of people in the Dominion. For a number of years the Arbitrate "on Court had ratified argeements reached at round-table conferences be-

tween employees and employers, but a flaw had been discovered in the Act and tire Court was granting concessions to unions. This had proved no hardship, but it had been considered advisable to restore to the Court the power it had been exercising for many rears.

The bill was to protect the power of the Court to include ill all award a matter relevant to the dispute. However, a certain section had decided to annihilate the bill, and aii agitation against tile tjill was Worked up under tlie surface.

Those responsible for the agitation secured the support of many big institut'ons and one of the biggest was the Farmers’ Union, which those opposed to the bill gulled into the belief that the bill, if passed, would bring farm labourers under the-jurisdiction of the Arbitration Court. There was never a more ridiculous statement than this, said Mr Smith as farm labourers always had the power to apply to the Court for an award, and in the past three such applications ha cl been made. The bill did not increase the facilities for bringing farm labourers under the juridiction of the Court, but it had suited those opposed to the bill for this misinterpretation to be made. The bill had been blocked by this opposition from the Farmers’ Union.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19301125.2.67

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 25 November 1930, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
330

BLOCKED BY FARMERS Hokitika Guardian, 25 November 1930, Page 7

BLOCKED BY FARMERS Hokitika Guardian, 25 November 1930, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert