Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IN INDIA

PROPOSED ARRANGEMENT

{United Press Association.—P j Electric Telegraph.—Copyright..]

(Received this day at 8 a.in.) LONDON, Nov. 17. The “Daily Telegraph” says the

Indian Princes deputation met the 1 British India representatives at Carlton Hotel yesterday and detailed the terms whereon they were prepared to enter an all Indian federation. If an agreement acceptable to all parties is reached, the conditions are: — > First—The Viceroy remains as the King’s representative. Second—All dynastic question* affecting Prince’s succession, marriage and powers within their states, etc., shall be left exclusively to themselves, the Federal Government having no authority. Third—They shall have a fair share in all State service* common to British India. and Indian states, such as railways, canals, irrigation, customs, and condition. Four—The Army remains under the Viceroy who may employ State troops when necessary. Five—The existin'? treaties to remain, but shall not be changed into fresh agreements with the All India Government. Six—The disciplinary authority shall exerciso certain cases by the Viceroy. Such cases as misrule shall he left to the Council of Princes. It is also understood that the ■PriitetiH will seek powerful representation in the second chamber. The only Prince opposed to entering an All India is Nizam Siderbnd. Moreover, Hindu leaders agreed to i'eoognise the north frontier, west province and Punjab, as predominantly Moslem and agree to the separation of Sind from Bombay. The Moslem demand for thirty-three per cent representation in the Central Legislature was not agreed to. The question of equitable representation .of Hindejp and Moslems in public services is left to the public services commission such as exists in Irish Free State.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19301118.2.36

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 18 November 1930, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
267

IN INDIA Hokitika Guardian, 18 November 1930, Page 5

IN INDIA Hokitika Guardian, 18 November 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert