Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNUSUAL ACCIDENT

HUSBAND AND WIFE' CLAIM DAMAGES. | By Telegraph, Per Ureas Association. WELLINGTON, November 10. The extent of the liability of the City Corporation if the head of a train ear trolly pole falls upon a person in the street was the question Air Barton, S.M., was asked to decide in a case in the Magistrate’s Court. Plaintiffs were Harry Koppert and his wife, Margaret Robinson Koppert, of Oaniaru, and the defendants the City Corporation.

Plaintiffs alleged that the defendant carelessly and negligently drove a tram car so that the trolley head fell upon the female plaintiff, seriously injuring her. Plaintiffs claimed £63 special damages and £IOO general damages.

Airs Koopert, in evidence said she was walking on the footpath when a trolley pole head flew off a passing tram ear. It hit her on the shoulder and then grazed her side. She was stunned by the shock. Her costume coat was torn and the skirt ruined bv rush and grease. She had to receive medical attention, and for some time afterwards, could not do any work.

Harry Koppert. engineer, said the trolley head was kept in position by a set-screw working in a groove, and was attached to a safety rope to prevent the head from flying off if the set-screw worked loose. Tf the head did fall off the screw must have become very loose and the rope must have been in a very had state of repair to break. If the rope did not break it must have been improperly tied.

Air Lockie. counsel for the Corporation, submitted that it had taken every precaution to avoid the accident. Everything was in proper working order. The Council felt a great deal of sympathy for plaintiffs, but if it were held liable for accidents of this nature over which it had to control it might he mulcted in damages amounting to thousands of pounds. It would have no possible hope of avoiding it.

The ATagistrate reserved his decision.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19301112.2.68

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 12 November 1930, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
329

UNUSUAL ACCIDENT Hokitika Guardian, 12 November 1930, Page 6

UNUSUAL ACCIDENT Hokitika Guardian, 12 November 1930, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert