Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN APPEAL

ACCIDENT INSURANCE CLAIM

By Telegraph—Per Press Association.) WELLINGTON, October 16. The Court of Appeal to-dav is engaged in hearing the appeal of the Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd., from a judgment delivered by Judge Llair on 13th September last in a case brought against it by Leslie Henry Long, a Wellington shipping clerk. The facts are that on 28th October last year when Long was insured with the company under an accident policy, passing Clyde Quay school grounds where children were playing, a tennis ball was driven out of the courts. '’ Long went to retrieve it and threw it back into the courts. It was a fairly long throw and he felt something “go” in his shoulder. Jt was an hour or so later, before he realised anything serious had happened, but later in the day, the pain drove him to the hospital, where the trouble was diagnosed as a severe sprain of the shoulder. Respondent required treatment till the following March, before the trouble was finally cured. The Assurance Coy., denying Long’s injury was covered by the risks insured against by the' policy, refused to pay Long the expenses incurred by him. The latter accordingly issued a writ claiming £9O os and costs, and obtained judgment against the Appellent Coy. Judge Blair holding the injury was covered by the risks included ill the pol.

An .appeal is now brought from that decision.

The argument is proceeding. Oil the Bench are the Chief Justice, Sir Michael Alyers, Judges Herdnian, Smith, and Kennedy.

For appellant Mr Boggard, for the respondent Mr Scott/WELLINGTON, Oct. IC.

Mr Hoggard for appellant said the respondent’s movements in causing the injury, were violent and visible, but neither accidental or external. Mr Scott for the respondent contended that the cause of injury was accidental within the meaning of the policy.

The Court reserved its decision

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19301016.2.42

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 16 October 1930, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
311

AN APPEAL Hokitika Guardian, 16 October 1930, Page 5

AN APPEAL Hokitika Guardian, 16 October 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert