Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BANKS’ REPRISALS

CHARGES FOR ACCOUNTS. DOUBLED. AND 10s NOTES CURTAILED. (By Telegraph—Press Association). WELLINGTON, September 3. The Chairman of . the. Associated Banks announces that as the result oi the/.Goyprnment’s action in increasing tiib uoto tax from three per cent, u four and a-half per cent., per annum,. i 1 lias-beeii,: denied to curtail the issue oj 10s notes. Silver, however, will be avail able in lien thereof. The Chairman said':—The rate of note tax is prohibitive, and while it remains on the Statute Book, the banks will he conducting their note issues at a very substantial loss. If, and when, the rate of note tax is reduced from four and a-half to three per cent, per annum, favourable consideration will lie given to the question of again circulating 10s notes.

The Chairman adds:—“The Government is well aware of the fact that the banks are at present paying income tax on considerably greater incomes than they would do if they \ycre taxed as ordinary companies. Jii other words, the. actual incomes of ,the banks are much less than those arrived at. by the arbitrary method laid down in Section 91 of the Land and Income Tax Act,-1923, already referred to; and, furthermore, the Government on it own initiative, called for rewhich have been furnished, showing tlie income, .of the individual banks if they were taxed for income tax- purposes as ordinary companies. Tlio returns furnished disclose that the banks are paying income tax on larger incomes than they would do if they returned their actual profits in their income tax returns; but, nevertheless, the Commissioner of Taxes has intimated that the present method of assessing the banks for income tax purposes-is .hot to be altered. As regards land tax, the banks are in an unfavourable position, and are most unfairly required to pay tax at tlio maximum rate on the aggregate unimproved, value of their numerous city and country braneehs. ’’

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19300904.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 4 September 1930, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
319

BANKS’ REPRISALS Hokitika Guardian, 4 September 1930, Page 3

BANKS’ REPRISALS Hokitika Guardian, 4 September 1930, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert