Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRITISH POLITICS.

IN THE COMMONS,

NEW ZEALAND NAVAL REPRESENTATIVE.

[United Press Association.—By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright. ]

(Received this day at 11 a.m.,

LONDON, July 7

In the House of Commons, Mr Crooksliank inquired into the reasons of the Government's refusal to r o-

ceiv’e the New Zealand nominated representative at the Naval Conference. Mr MacDonald: "There never was nor could be any question of the Government declining to receive a representative nominated by New Zealand.” j)lr Crooksliank: “Do you mean to say the statements made in the House of Lords are quite incorrect.” Mr MacDonald: “No.” .Mr Crooksliank: “Then what do j'ou mean.” There was no reply.

REPLIES TO QUESTIONS

(Official ’Wireless.)

(Received this day at 10.39 a.m ) RUGBY, Jrilv 7.

In . the House of' Commons to-day various questions regarding the Naval Treaty were addressed to the Prime Minister. He said that, at the time when the preliminary negotiations took place in' August and September last with the United -States, the question of cruiser replacement was considered by the Admiralty and the figure of 91,000 tons was put forward for the new tonnage to be completed by the end of 1936. This figure was employed in the ensuing . conversations, which had for their object the removal of earlier difficulties in regard to cruiser limitations. These preliminary, conversations were for the purpose only of clearing the ground prior to the London Conference. The figure of 91,000 tons was finally fixed during the Conference, when after negotiations with United States and Japan, it w;>s found that it met the (British replacement- requirements within terms of .'the treaty. The Prime Minister added that the forthcoming Imperial Conference might well afford a .convenient opportunity for, discussing the. naval building programme in the light of the London naval treaty the definite question of discussing- a limitations of tonnage which the treaty imposed could be raised by any Dominion that so desired.

At the Secretary, for India’s request, various questions regarding the composition and terms of reference of the. round, table conference on Indian affairs were postponed until Wednesday.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19300708.2.33

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 8 July 1930, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
341

BRITISH POLITICS. Hokitika Guardian, 8 July 1930, Page 5

BRITISH POLITICS. Hokitika Guardian, 8 July 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert