Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRITISH POLITICS.

REPLIES TO QUESTIONS

L United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright.]

(Received this day at noon.) RUGBY, Feb. 3

A number of questions were put to Mr Henderson. (Foreign Secretary) in the House of Commons this afternoon about Communist propaganda in this country.

Mr Henderson restated the Government’s position. Government were firmly determined not to be rushed into any hasty judgment in these, matters. Should cause for serious complaint arise, the Government would not hesitate to take the House into their confidence, but they must, in the first instance, be the judges as to any action which might be expedient or necessary to safeguard the interests of the country. Mr Henderson was asked if he denied a statement which appeared in the ‘L? vest in,” the organ of the 'Soviet Government, that it was futile to expect any change in the eomitern’s activity as a result of the Anglo-Soviet agreement, and if it was not a tact that from the moment the Treaty was signed, the terms of it had been flagrantly broken.

Mr Henderson said he had denied nothing. Sir Austen Chamberlain (former Foreign Secretary) recalled that on a previous occasion Mr Henderson had said he had made representations to the Soviet Ambassador about propaganda h.v the Third International, and that Mr Henderson had then stated lie had not asked for an answer. Sir A. Chamberlain asked whether the answer had now been given hv the soviet Ambassador. Mr Henderson replied that there were occasions when the public interest demanded silence.

In the Commons, Mr MacDonald in reply to a question, said the Postmaster-General had not refused to use beam wireless for overseas telephony. On the contrary the Cabinet committee was considering the subject. Mr Howard Bury: Is it not a fact Imperial beam has been neglected and allowance was made to an American company prejudicing Empire communications seriously. I understand that is inaccurate, hut the question should he addressed to the Postmaster-General.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19300204.2.39

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 4 February 1930, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
324

BRITISH POLITICS. Hokitika Guardian, 4 February 1930, Page 5

BRITISH POLITICS. Hokitika Guardian, 4 February 1930, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert