Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

KAWARAU DAM

CLAIMHOLDERS SLOW TO PAY., FORFEIT OF RIGHTS PROPOSED. DUNEDIN, August 19. Though the gates of the Kawarau. Dam have been closed for about' a week and the river has .fallen to a very low level', the elaimholders fejnain inactive. Xfter the initial efforts iii 192 G, when the .gates were first Hosed,, the/ elaimholders have; done practically nothing on ‘Kawarau; in which has'been sunk capital est-i- ---* mated at nearly £SCO,OCO in the past three years. The iminers at Cromwell are, the only ones who have made a serious attempt to work the river, none of the other parties having endeavoured to secure a return on their capital. Proposals for an amalgamation of tho elaimholders have .been made, but, these have reached a dead end, as several clauses in tho proposed agreement are not acceptable to the Kawarau Company. It is stated that it is now the intention of the financial holders behind the scheme that those who are in default with their payments to the parent company should forfeit their rights to the particular quarter-mile stretches along the river. Interesting developments are expected in sqme quarters when a definite move is made to deprive of their claim those, who have fallen behind in their payments.

Those who are acquainted with the working of tho soli erne state that m their preliminary calculations the constructors of the dam overlooked the inflow to the Kawarau from, the Shotover, Arrow, Nevis, and other rivers. The flow of water from tHo i?.ho+over had been considerately underestimated, and this has groatlv hampered the whole scheme. The Kawarau Dam itself, which was erected at a cost of £106.000, has proved a very efficient barrier, so far as it has gone, but owing to other factors tlie level of the river has not been reduced to the expected level. At present the position appears to be that cohesion is needed amongst the elaimholders. and, further than that, the advice of an outside expert is claimed to bo absolutely essential.

Divided amongst those interested the cost of engaging a well-known Continental or English engineer should not be excessive.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19290821.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 21 August 1929, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
352

KAWARAU DAM Hokitika Guardian, 21 August 1929, Page 2

KAWARAU DAM Hokitika Guardian, 21 August 1929, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert