LIBEL ACTION

Hokitika Guardian, 7 February 1929, Page 5

LIBEL ACTION

PLAINTIFF’S CASE FAILS. 'United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph—Copyright). (Received this day at 8.30. a.m.) LONDON, February fi. v After a most searching cross examination, the libel action by Sir Harry Xorris against the Football Association /rising from the publication of the report of a commission appointed in Au>gust 1927. to inquire into affairs of Arsenal Football Club, abruptly ended, i 'the words complained of related to L. the manner that Norris charged I against the Club, expenses of a J chauffeur and also the hire of a motor car to enable Norris to carry out bis duties ns. chairman of the club. Defendants pleaded justification, fair comment and privilege. Norris, under cross-examination, admitted placing the chauffeur Ryder’s name on the Club books for staff wages. Ho signed Ryder’s name fortyLyeji times for 70s a week, but Ryder MdoWt'i] I‘3 a week, Norris keeping 10s M cover Ryder’s bouse rent. <V-#’ Questioned regard a cheque for Cl7O received in 192(5 lor the use of the Club’s motor bus. Norris said lie endorsed it in Hte name rtf the Secretary, whose authority lie had. and added “ |>ay to order of Lady Norris,” and paid it into her account. Re-examined Norris said the Arsenal owed £BSOO <>n loan account absolutely • unsecured. He paid over £2OOO Imm bis own pocket to get players foi k Club. • Justice Hewart ruled the occasion was privileged. There was no evidence of malice and no case to go to a .Miry Ifc gave judgment for the Association with costs.