Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLICE COMMISSION

FURTHER EVIDENCE. I United Press Association—By Electric ' Telegraph—Copyright). .(Received this day at 11.25. a.m.) LONDON, Oct. 22. Archibald Bodkin, giving evidence before the Police Commission, took the public behind scenes in several famous murder cases. He mentioned the Vaquien murder, the Byfleet, the publican, Jones and Gutteridge case. Lee said apparently the police charged Browne and Kennedy with theft when they were really concerned about the murder. They had the murder charge up their sleeves but got at Browne and Kennedy by charging them with lesser crimes. Bodkin raised his hand in a gesture of protest, and said he could not accept the expression “Got at.” It was in a man’s own interest to explain the possession of a revolver at the earliest opportunity. Lee asked was it considered convenient when a man was suspected of a grave crime to charge him with a lesser offence, in order to have a better opportunity of questioning him. Sir Reginald Poole added: “In order to get him under lock and key.” 'Mr Bodkin replied: “There are cases when the police suspect a man, but if the police find he has committed 'other crimes it is their duty to arrest him. He can then be questioned regarding the other matter under lock and key.”

He added: “1 think this is a fifst rate procedure from the public viewpoint.” Bodkin emphatically denied the existence of the third degree, declaring judges 'never once sustained such a plea. Lee remarked that it was one person’s word against another’s. Bodkin replied: “It is the Court’s business to discover credibility.’ Poole suggested that a policeman’s good character helped him against a, prisoner.

Bodkin: “Put bluntly, that’s pei'jury.”

Poole: The safeguards do not prove a policeman does not commit perjury.

Bodkin expressed the opinion that it was unlikely an officer would deceive a judge, counsel, or jury. Poole nsked under what statute were the people detaine^l.

Bodkin : There is no statute. It is practice and common sense. Commissioner Pick: It is illegal. Bodkin; Tt is not illegal. Poole: It is not sanctioned by statute.

Bodkin: A great many things in our law do not have the sanction of the statute and a good thing too. Bodkin expressed the opinion that the police were fully competent to interpret the true sense of the people’s statements.

Lee said Bodkin was inclined to attribute superhuman powers to policemen. Few people were able to interpret the human mind.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19281023.2.42

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 23 October 1928, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
407

POLICE COMMISSION Hokitika Guardian, 23 October 1928, Page 5

POLICE COMMISSION Hokitika Guardian, 23 October 1928, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert