Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A CHALLENGE

PROGRESS LEAGUE AND TOURIST DEPARTMENT. By Telegraph—Press Assn., Copyright. CHRISTCHURCH, March 8. At a meeting of the executive of the Canterbury Progress League a letter was received from -Mr Jl. M. Wilson (General Manager of tire Tourist Department) denying that the South Island was neglected in the preparation of itineraries.

The letter ends: “To end this matter I give you a straight out challenge to prove your statement. If you can show to the satisfaction of tiro Minister or the Public Service Commissioner, that any responsible officer of the Tourist Department has advised visitors not to go to the South Island as there was little or nothing to see there, or has in any other way tried to divert tourist traffle from the South Island. I shall call upon that officer to resign, anil more than that I shall send in my papers at the same time. This challenge is contingent on your placing your position on the other side of the sealcs. ’

Members of the executive expressed surprise at the tone of the letter and a motion was carried approving of the action taken by the special committee in protesting at the discrimination against the Solitli Island.

ait DAN" ItFRSK lIEI’I.IKS. (’HlllSTC'HrilC'll. M.,1.1, 7

Replying to Mr B. .M. Wilson, re tourist propaganda. Mr Dan Reese says in a letter: “ I must confess that the tone of your letter surprises me very much, coining from one holding such a responsible position. Your own reputation and the esteem in which you are hold precludes anybody for a moment suggesting that, you personally would contribute to the cause of the South Island complaint regarding tourist traffic or that you would in any way encourage such a policy, so why take the criticism in such a personal manner. There is no gainsaying the fact that the South Island has not had its fair share of this tourist traffic. Some people here suggest: that sinister influences are at work in the far north, lmt I think the reasons are to lie found in natural causes. It is astonishing how few South Island people have been to Rotorua and how few North Island people have been to Mount Cook. and. so if your officers in tfie North and particularly in Australia, are not moil who know the scenic wonders of the South Island, then it is easily explained why Rotorua District gets such a prefer-

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280308.2.40

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 8 March 1928, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
403

A CHALLENGE Hokitika Guardian, 8 March 1928, Page 3

A CHALLENGE Hokitika Guardian, 8 March 1928, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert