Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT

THURSDAY. FEB. 16th. (Before W. Meldrum, Esq., S.M.) LICENSING ACT. The police charged two offenders with being on licensed premises after hours (Masonic Hotel). Ordered to pay costs 10s each. Two others similarly charged (Masonic Hotel) were convicted, one to pay costs 10s and the other fined 40s and costs. ,7. W. Gray, charged with procuring liquor while prohibited, was fine 1 ov and costs 10s. DEBT CASES. Judgment for plaintiff by default was given in the following cases: J. A. ChosTiey v. Thus Fitzgerald, claim £•"> Os Od and costs 18s 6(1. Same v. Tlios and P. J. Fitzgerald. £lo Os Od and costs 38s Od. Same v. P. J. Fitzgerald, £lB Os Od and £8 10s Od, and costs 22s Od and 25s Od. Westland Hospital Board v. A. E. Morel, £lO 13s Od and costs 365. Same v. Clarence Hunt. £2O 11s Od and costs £1 14s. Same v. Arthur Ellis. £2l 8s Od and costs. Same v. Leslie Stewart. £l2 15s Od and costs los. I. Brown (Mr Elcock) v. Albert Thomas. £1 7s, 10(1 and costs Bs. Roy Paterson (Mr Elcoeu) v. Geo. Bell. £3 13s Od and costs 23s Gd. Same v. Basil Gibbons. £1 3s 6d and costs los. I. Browii (Mr Elcock) v. T. Tainui. judgment summons, £8 lli anti costs los Gd. Ordered to pay £1 10s per month in default 14 day's. DEFENDED CASES. T. Browii (Mr Elcock) v. Geo. Bell, judgment summons £3 14s sd. No order made. I. Browii (Mr Elcock) v. Wm. Orpwood. Judgment summons £2 IBs Gd. No order made. Wostirtnd Hospital Board v. Charles Dennison claim £7l 2s. Mr Murdoch raised the point of liability to cfkitfi. Judgment flefSirffl. ;fßliti J. Mrihgnn (Mr Elcbokl r: J, Wilmot (Mi' Mtifdbeli) cl Hi Hi £5

Is Sonic of the items of the account and counter claim £8 2s 2d were disputed. After hearing the plaintiff and defendant, judgment was given for plaintiff for £2 17s and costs £2- is. and on the counter claim for defendant for £8 2s 2d and costs £1 11s.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280216.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 16 February 1928, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
348

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Hokitika Guardian, 16 February 1928, Page 1

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Hokitika Guardian, 16 February 1928, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert