Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SAMOA COMMISSION

(Special to Press Association by Radio (Received this day at 8 a.m.) APIA, Oct. 1. Auelua Louvai, formerly clerk to the interpreter of the native Department gave evidence, through an interpreter. He complnincd that Arorotor’s title had been taken away and no reason had been given him. He admitted convictions for abduction and perjury. He did not think Samoa should be administered by a Samoan. The Legislative Council, with throe native memliers should make laws.

Snltni complained that the title had lwen taken away and lie had been banished in 1925, for reasons which lie considered insufficient. Before his trial he had not been notified of the specific charges which would have to bo met. The proposed new law for the subdivision of land would undermine the influence of Matai’s heads of families and cause them to lose control over their families, likely to result in serious trouble in Samoa.

Self Government, of Samoa by Samoans and desired by the Man was advocated by this witness, and also by the next witness, Tialavea Faitclc. Alipiata, a high Samoan orator, also Samoan member of the Citizens’ League, gave evidence before the Commission on lines of Tamasese (High Chief) that the Man’s object was the Government of Samoa by Samoans under protection of the British flag, and to make its own laws. The Man never tried to have Richardson removed from Office.

Tun, a Chief of Snfune Savaii, protested against his banishment, the presentation of five mats, inhabitation of the medical tax and agreed with Tamasese and Alipiata as to the objects and hopes of Mau and the absence of a desire for the removal of Richardson.

Umjiga Pau also expressed a desire for Self-Government, and objects of the Mau, and was supported hy Faamau Sili, who- wms formerly Secretary to Malieton. Faamau Sili deposed he and a friend were banished because in conversation with a friend they said, one, Faipule had no credit in the district, having a big leg (elephantiasis) and the second Faipule could neither read nor write. Cross-examined ho unreservedly admitted he and his friend had suggested setting up a kingship under Matietoa, and it was for this they were banished, on a charge of sedition.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19271003.2.32

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 3 October 1927, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
370

SAMOA COMMISSION Hokitika Guardian, 3 October 1927, Page 3

SAMOA COMMISSION Hokitika Guardian, 3 October 1927, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert