Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FILM AS THEFT EVIDENCE.

PARIS, May AD. A cinema lilm may lie produced as evidence in the Assize'Court at. Beauvais, when Kouffer and Sautter are tried on charges of breaking into tint famous Chateau ol Chantilly and stealing the great pink stone known as the Condo diamond and other valuables. Both men confessed alter arrest and were taken hack to Chantilly, where, in accordance with French police practice. the burglary was reconstituted with their aid. A lilm was taken of the reconstitution and it is proposed to show this to the jury, to enable them to form a clear idea of how the burglary was carried out. If the judge allows this it will ho the first time the cinema has served as an adjunct, in a criminal trial.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19270709.2.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 9 July 1927, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
129

FILM AS THEFT EVIDENCE. Hokitika Guardian, 9 July 1927, Page 1

FILM AS THEFT EVIDENCE. Hokitika Guardian, 9 July 1927, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert