LIBEL ACTION.

Hokitika Guardian, 28 March 1923, Page 2

LIBEL ACTION.

BROUGHT BY PROFESSIONAL SINGER. AUSTRALIAN AND N. 7.. CABLE ASSOCIATION. LONDON, March 2(1. • A novel libel action has been brought by Miss Phyllis Lett against Rathe Frercs in connection with the issue of old gramophone records made in 1010. which she claims do not represent her voice us it is to-day. Miss Lett’s counsel said that the records were made ten years ago and had lost much in quality. He mentioned that many singers were engaged for provincial tours on the strength of gramophone records, and Miss' Lett’s provincial engagements, which had been increasing by leaps and hounds, dropped as a result of the defective records. Unpleasant newspaper criticism of the records led to the present action. The imputation was that she was a. singer cf no importance jsnd no artistic ability. Mr Justice Lush remarked: “It is difficult to see how you get libel out of Hint. It requires a little consideration.’’ Counsel: What the plaintiff complains of is that the records should not have been issued marked as new. Sir l.andou Ronald gave evidence that the record was awful and he thought that it would be laid for Miss I.ett's reputation Miss Lett gave evidence that when she heard the new record she "'as horrified. Counsel for the defence said that 1 ’uthe Frercs offered to put the date on future records. ATis-. T.ctt : ‘‘Hut- the damage is done. A hundred records have been issued.” LONDON. March 20. The gramophone ease hearing has been adjourned till next term. The judge agreed tr hear the records.