Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Income Tax Charges.

FIXES OF £IOO IMPOSED. WELLINGTON. December 10. A summons case ol unusual propoitiems was called before Air F. K. Hunt, S.AL, at the Alagistrate’s Court to-day, the defendant, Samuel Turner, having to answer two charges of negligently making a lalse return to the Income Tax Commissioner. Air P. S. K. Alacassey prosecuted, and defendant. who pleaded guilty, was represented by Mr R. L. Afacalister. Defendant, said Air Alacassey, was a well-known mountaineer, and he had for many years past been employed by the firm of Lonsdale and Company at a salnrv of about £I2OO per year. Be had dealings with the Australian Salt Company, bv whi.-h lie considerably supplemented his income, and it al.-o was suggested that by private speculations in salt still more money acciiiin’lnted. With regard to the .information laid in connection with ALivch 1921. defendant return his income as being about £1370. whereas it was assessed by the department at C 4037. ' fn 1020 the amount set down by TurI net- was £1370. but the depaitment I maintained that his income for that | particular year was £8959. It wms thought that the differences between the assessments of Turner and those of the department represented amounts made by defendant in his dealings in salt, and to which he had not made reference. Apart from the above defendant also invested freely in piopurt.y, etc., and had made substantial loans. Afr Afacalister explained that besides his -.wit private income defendant was interested in that of a. company trading as "Samuel Turner. Ltd.” As far ns defendant’s personal account was

concerned everything was in order with the exception of the omission of a suspense account, which on the advice of an accountant hail boon opened some time ago when Turner was experiencing difficulty in obtaining necessary shipments of salt. The account was necessary to hack contracts. It defendant suffered any heavy losses lie would have had the suspense account to fall back on. This account was at the root of all the trouble, and it was very unfortunate that ‘defendant had not mentioned its existence to the commissioner. Under these circumstances counsel asked that a nominal fine be inflicted. Air Alacassey pointed out that Turner hid drawn large sums of money f:om the suspense account for his own private use. The Alagistrate: I can’t see a redeeming feature in the whole ease. This man has omitted to account for some thousands of pounds. Ho may he unfortunate, blit he is well ofF and can afford to pay for Lis knowledge. He is fined £IOO on each of the two charges.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19221218.2.35

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 18 December 1922, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
432

Income Tax Charges. Hokitika Guardian, 18 December 1922, Page 4

Income Tax Charges. Hokitika Guardian, 18 December 1922, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert