Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Prize & velopes.

• ismti inc Till-: <"> I! IV M V(; IST HAT K l TTKHS A WAKNLN<!. AIT KI.AND, N»' |' s - I, v ~f ‘.!l Is ( aril (111 m.m fur M-lli.if: |»n«* c nvc-lop. s i > - [end., nl" afterwards stopped him "> f |U nn.l ncii tint would have l"" 1 ' *.i|i,irari'il lie knew "" . x^ [ho magistrate ;..,d court had boon ’ l|ut| - * <l (‘l want to say now Unit Urn Al '| lias l u'Cii in operation f‘»' :t ' ■ Vl ' ! ' r> - i, is ti.no it rllfol'ri'd l.vo, ; ■i t.iit inucd tlio macs trill.* wlio do lids sort nl l lino Ir.vo Uf- ' penalties impost’d, and inst laiiK • 1)](< , ml H, is just as "'i'll th- t run. Tliry arc HaUo to a hne nl f 0 for 1 1.0 lirst ollriiro. and six .non.l iniprisoninonl lor tlio Mu- in I 1,, ill,, las' nominal penalty.” TAVI.OI! Kit \MS It IN CASK. ■ SVDN’I’iV. November -A. ’’ 1,, tli,. case in whirl, Sir A. Taylor ' arrusrd Mr Bl’iliusttm, a m.-ml "• t . |„. City Council ol' liriln ry. rounsrl - in lli.-‘ defence to-day a.ldi.'ss.d C ' Court. ( bulls,d said tlu'io ".is not a r M i,.„tilla of rvitlriirr to warrant send- - in„ ill. ••(lrl’rinhint lor trial. U tlio o' •- r ,l,M„r was rol-irrt. lll.’ll "|rn 1.0- ; hi,„l tlio prose,’.dion won- not olio bit hot tor Ilian tlio man wlmm they dunged and tboy w.-ro in truth guilty ol the cresset orimo of attempting to seduce AJr lirnmstone tlo commit a r,niiii' There was no ovidolloo to show that VI r ltramstoii bad taken any bribe. 1 Tim evidence was that, uji to a point o u horo a trap was laid for Mr Bn.niton ho was a oloan man. 1 ‘ C.iunsol srollod at tin- ridiculous 1 idea that Mr Bramstnn should have 1 tiil,on what ho had never soon before I to his heart, and have flillon mto 0 tlu-ir trap like « poor silly Idol. After severely criticising tin? ovidenoo S uf those witnesses who allowed that thy had offered a bribe, Counsel dos (.lured that they were parties to a conspiracy, and were engaged in a most despicable transaet ion. s (ph,. Magistrate deolared lie found a prime facie case against Bramstnn. II The defendant pleaded not guilty, ‘ r reserved his defence, being committed for trial. Bail was fixed at only £BO.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19211124.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 24 November 1921, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
384

Prize & velopes. Hokitika Guardian, 24 November 1921, Page 1

Prize & velopes. Hokitika Guardian, 24 November 1921, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert