Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DIVORCE LAW.

WELLINGTON, Oct'. 0. Important observations on. the divorce law were made by His Honour Sir John Salnvond in the course of a reserved judgment delivered yesterday on a petition for restitution of conjugal rights. “The same considerations which have led the English Courts to refuse a decree of restitution to a. petitioner who is separated from his wife by a deed of separation apply,” remarked his Honour, “added force to the exercise by this Court of its discretionary authority to make such a decree as a preliminary to divorce. The case of persons separated by agree meat is expressly dealt with by the Legislature in section i of the Act of 1920. When this separation has continued for three years it constitutes a discretionary ground for divorce, and will lie recognised by this Court as sufficient unless the eircu instances of the individual case are such a# to show, that a, divorce would be prejudicial to the public interest. “This is the true method appointed by the Legislature for the dissolution of marriages which have come to an end do facto by an agreed separation. Neither of such parties can properly be allowed to obtain an immediate divorce by resort to the summary procedure of a decree of restitution of conjugal rights, without awaiting the lapse of the prescribed statutory period. Such a system of divorce would be a grave and mischievous departure from the requirements of the public interest in the sanctity and permanence of the marriage tie. I do not say, indeed, that an agreement of separation is in all circumstances an absolute bar to a decree ofl restitution of conjugal rights. Even in England it would seem to be a discretionary rather than an absolute liar. It is conceivable that an agreement of separation may bo obtained by one party from tlie other under ■such circumstances that the agreement may in the public interest he disregarded in a suit for restitution. There are, however, no such exceptional circumstances in the case under notice.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19211008.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 8 October 1921, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
338

DIVORCE LAW. Hokitika Guardian, 8 October 1921, Page 2

DIVORCE LAW. Hokitika Guardian, 8 October 1921, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert