Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT

STATUS OF THE JUDGE,

WELLINGTON, Ki-b. 3. The Attorney-General has issued the following statement: —

‘‘There seems to exist some misapprehension as to the status and position of the Hon Mr Justice Frazer, whs has recently been appointed Judge of the Arbitration Court, and my attention has been called to some paragraphs which have recently appeared in certain newspapers suggesting that the Government imposed conditions in the case of the present Judge, rendering the position he holds, in some aspects, inferior to the position of his predecessors in office. That is not the case. The Government has neither the power, nor the desire, to impose any such conditions. The Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1908, provides expressly that a Judge of the Arbitration Court shall, as to tenure of office, salary, emoluments, and privileges (including superannuation allowance), have the same rights, and be subject to the same provisions, as a Judge of the Supreme Court, and it also provides that the Arbitration Act shall operate as a permanent appropriation of his salary. His Honour, therefore, has all the rank, privileges, and immunities ol a Judge of the Supreme Court. But, by other provisions of the Arbitration Act and its amendments, a Judge of ' the Arbitration Court may, on an emergency, be appointed to be a temporary Judge of the Supreme Court, to perform the ordinary functions of a Judge of that Court, and, alternatively a Judge of the Arbitration Court may be appointed permanently a Judge of the Supreme Court, and bo called upon to give part of his time to the duties of that Court. It is considered by the Government to be inadvisable that the Judge of the Arbitration Court should be detached from the business of that Court to assist in the ordinary work of the Supreme Court when the work q.l the latter Court falls in arrear for any reason, and before the offer of the appointment was made to Mr Fraser ,it had been decided by the Government that the work of the Arbitration Court ought not to be interfered with and delayed by any exigencies of another Court, and that, therefore, in future, the Government would abstain from exercising its power of utilising a Judge of the Arbitration Court for the purposes of the business oi the Supreme Court. Mr Frazer was notified of that decision, and of the reasons for it, when the offer of the appointment was made to him, and he entirely agreed with both decisions and the reasons for them.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19210208.2.33

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 8 February 1921, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
421

ARBITRATION COURT Hokitika Guardian, 8 February 1921, Page 4

ARBITRATION COURT Hokitika Guardian, 8 February 1921, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert