Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT

(Per Press Association.) THE NEW BONUS. WELLINGTON, Dec. 3. As the result of a statement by the representatives of various unions at the Arbitration Court to-day, the Court decided to give unions the opportunity of submitting reasons why the 9s bonus should be granted to their particular unions.

Judge Stringer said that lie took it that the whole matter would be accepted as a contingent on the decision of the Court as the result of recent argument, hut it was pointed out that special circumstances obtained in special industries.

The Judge therefore said that the opportunity stated above would be afforded this afternoon, when the applications of the Typographical, Bookbinders’, Hairdressers’, and Drivers’ Unions will be heard.

December 9t,h has. been fixed as the date upon wliicli nil other applications will be taken. WELLINGTON, Dee. 4.

In applying for the 9s bonus for the Typographical Union, Mr Chapman on their behalf, claimed there was a big margin between the cost of production and land values and wages. In 1914 compositors erceived £3 5s weekly and at present £5 13s. He objected to the reduction in hours any payment for holidays being taken into acebmil. The basic wage to-day ought to be £5 18s fid. There was no unemployment, oh the contrary men had been recalled from superannuation or retirement. . Mr Pirani for the employers said Mr Chapman’s figures were antiquated. •Wages had increased 82 to 102 per cent. Ho laid particular stress on the advance in. the cost of materials and especially of paper, which had gone from £l2 to £7O per ton. For years a number of printing businesses had not paid dividends. At least twenty were in this position and others were not prosperous. He pointed out that men were earning up to £8 3s 7d per week. He could 1 not understand persons earning such wages demanded a bonus. The greatest objection to it was the matter of public policy. Newspapers were being cut down in size and. if charges again increased prices would have to bo raised. It was harmful to the community to clip the newspaper’s wings. It would be dangerous to increase the price to 3d. It, was in the.public ill* terst that newspapers should be helped and not forced to'curtail their news. AT their expenses were being increased, yet the lowest wages was £5 13s for 45 hours as against £3 5s for 48, hours work. Judgment in this, and all other applications was reserved.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19201204.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 4 December 1920, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
414

ARBITRATION COURT Hokitika Guardian, 4 December 1920, Page 1

ARBITRATION COURT Hokitika Guardian, 4 December 1920, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert