£1000 CLAIM
PLAINTIFF NONSUITED. SEQUEL TO MOTOR ACCIDENT. (By Telegraph—Press Association.) WELLINGTON, Sept. 7. On the ground that there was substantially no evidence as to how or where the accident occurred or as to whether there was negligence on the part of any person unknown, Neil B. Hood was nonsuited in a claim for £lOOO from insurance companies subjeetd to the Motor Vehicles Insurance (Third Party Risks) Act, 1928. Mr. E. Page, S.M., intimated that the tribunal considered it was bound by the ordinary rules of evidence and as a matter of law he did not think that the account of the accident written by the claimant before he lost his memory was admissible.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19330907.2.64
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXIII, Issue 227, 7 September 1933, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
114£1000 CLAIM Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXIII, Issue 227, 7 September 1933, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
NZME is the copyright owner for the Hawke's Bay Tribune. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in