OTAGO
The contest between Major Bichardson and ex-judge Harris is likely to be a keen one. Both are men of mark, both personally popular. Mr. Harris’s address displays “ fencing ability” of no low order, but the Major hits out “ straight.” The chief point, perhaps the only point of difference, is on the proper mode of disposing of the land. Both admit the principle of its being a trust for the public benefit. Mr. Harris proposes to check speculators by increasing the upset price of rural land, and vaguely proposes a land tax. We believe Mr. Harris is not only a land speculator, but has been a most successful one. On the other hand the Major wishes to cuiorce the ts improvement conditions” under which the rural lands have been sold, and to punish the noncompliers by a land tax. The Daily Times appears to be disposed to support Mr. Harris. The Major has our sympathy, not only on account of his views, with which we coincide, but for the manly and straightforward manner in which he expresses them. — Commnnicated.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBT18630309.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hawke's Bay Times, Volume II, Issue 96, 9 March 1863, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
179OTAGO Hawke's Bay Times, Volume II, Issue 96, 9 March 1863, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.