Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TECHNICAL BREACH

— Press ; Association.)

Prosecutions That Can Do No Good

(By' Telegrapb-

" AUCKLAND, Last Night. -^Prosecutions such , as this. can. do no goody but only have. the .effect of aggravating employers .and dispelling the feeling of- friendliness that; sometimes exists between employer and employeeas in this instance/ ; said Mr. Wv vern Wilson,. S.M., after ihearing a prosecution in the Magistrate?sr Court brought by the Inspeetor of Awards, Mr. H. S. Hurle, against Sidney Walter Mayer, i butcher, of Mt. Eden road, for: comniit- | ting a breach of tHe Butehers ' Award jthrough failing to pay overtime. Mr. Hurle said he called at defendiant's shop on June 1 to investigate a ! complaint that two assistants , of ten worked after the liour wihen the award compelled them to stop unless overtime was paid. Ile spent about a quarter of an hour in the shop, during which Itime little work was done before the ;men prepari-d to leave the shop. When |he returned on June 7 to inspect thc ;time book, he found no overtime- had 'been entered or » payment made. .In reply to the Magistrate, the [inspeetor said the amount involved in each case was about ls Qd, which in a small shop would amount to about 10s a week. With a large irm it might total as much as £50 a week if it were allowed .to go on. Bepresenting the defendant, Mr. Newbery said a happy spirit Tuled between the employer and his assistants. There was no strictness about the starting hour, and the employees were never lotih to niake up for any. timo they might have lost .through being late. After the evidence of one employee in support^of counsel's statement, the Magistrate said that _ had a propei investigation been made into the circumstances, under which defendant 's business was conducted, the inspeetor of the departi^ent would never have instituted bhe prosecution. Apparently on one occasion there had been some jlaxity but no injustice had been done !to either of the workers. There had' been a technical brCach, i however, and a penalty of one shilling was imposed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBHETR19370721.2.115

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 157, 21 July 1937, Page 9

Word Count
347

TECHNICAL BREACH Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 157, 21 July 1937, Page 9

TECHNICAL BREACH Hawke's Bay Herald-Tribune, Issue 157, 21 July 1937, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert