RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, GREYMOUTH.

Grey River Argus, Volume IX, Issue 661, 14 April 1870, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, GREYMOUTH.

Tuesday, April 12. (Before W. H. Revell, Esq., R.M.) CIVIL CASES. Hugh Barnhill v. Garvin Graham, Olcarito. — Claim of L2O. Judgment by default, with costs. Barclay and Co. v. R. Dudley. — Claim of LI 2s 6d. Date altered to the 19th inst. G. Martin v. A. Thomas.— Claim of L 2 10s. Judgment for plaintiff, with costs. T. P. .Rapson v. Barclay, and Coj— Claim of L 2 ss. Case dismissed, with costs. Barclay and Co v. Salvin. — Judgment by default for L 3 9s Id and costs. R. J. Scottock v. Irvine. — Claim; of LI 10s. Case dismissed with costs. D. Carroll v. Richard Ormond. — Judgment confessed for L 23 7s 6d, and costs. Feodora de Pearson v. Mary Ann Smith. — Claim of L 5. Judgment for plaintiff L 3 10s, and costs. H. Barnhill v. Keilly and Haslem. — Judgment by default for L7l 10s 6d, $,nd COSts. ; Same v. Hearse.— Judgment for plaintiff, L 6 4s 7d, and costs. : ■ > H. Noy v. J. Arnott, carpenter. — Claim of L 5 6s lid. J udgmeut for pl&intiff, with coste. Elizabeth Burke v. Charles Winsch.— Claim of L3O. Judgment was given j for LlO and costs. ! De Costa and Co. v. H. Hope. — Judgment confessed for Ll7 3s. ! M'Oarthy and Co. v. Hurse and Co;.^- 1 Judgment confessed for Lls and costs! : M. A. Smith v. F. de Pearson. -^-Clkim of L 6 103. Judgment for L 2 and costs.