MAGISTERIAL.

Globe, Volume XXIV, Issue 2431, 20 January 1882, Page 3

MAGISTERIAL.

OHBISTOHTJBOH. Thttbsday, Jaotjabx 19. [Before B. Westenra and J. P. Jameson, E»qs., J.P.'s.] Civil Cases—Muirhoad v Tosswill, £3; Mr Stringer appeared for defendant. Plaintiff, a farmer at Templeton, stated that a mob of sheep belonging to defendant, his neighbor, broke into a paddock oE growing oats and caused damage to the extent of the claim asabove. Two witnesses proved that the assessment nf the damage was a fair one. Defendant objected to the claim aa being excessive, and because some of the plaintiffs sheep contributed to the damage. Two witnesses corroborated his version of the affair. Judgment was given plaintiff for £2 and costs.—McLellan v Beattie, a claim for balance due for wages, £l7 Is, as groom to an entire horse, Ben Lomond. Mr Spaokman appeared for plaintiff, Mr Slater for defendant. Plaintiff deposed that he had been engaged at a wage of £2 weekly, and had received £ls in part payment. Defendant pleaded that the wages were to bet £1 10s per week and £lB 14i had been paid on account, and that plaintiff had left before the period for which he was engaged had expired. Judgment was given for plaintiff for £3 16s with costs. In Horner v Pepper, an undisputed claim for £8 6s 63, judgment was) given for plaintiff with costs. Judgments went by default for plaintiffs with costs in Upjohn v Trask, £5 12a 4d; Springfield Coal Co. v Christchuroh Steam Laundry Co., £lO 10a; and Prankish v Fleming, £lO. Petersen v Delaney, Kerr v Delaney, Angell v Johnson, and Pringle v Moore were adjourned till January 26th.

SOUTHBEIDGE. Thttbbdat, jANrAET 19. [Before B. Beetham, Esq., EM, and E. J. Lee and J. B. Campbell, Eeqts., J .P.'e.l Abbauxt.—Thomas Tollerton v H. Brown i fined 20s and costs ss, and witness' expenses 15s. Same v same, abusive language ; fined 20s and oosts 7s. Citil Cases.—Waterton v P. Bull, claim £37 ; adjourned from December 15th. This case was re-heard, and judgment given for defendant with costs £1 17s and solicitor's fee £3 3s. Bull v Watson, claim £l2 14s 6d ; withdrawn, Mr Izard appeared for plaintiff, Mr Bruges for defendant. Desborongh v M. Beach, claim £23 ; judgment by default for amount claimed and costs 26j, and professional fee £3 3p. Mr Izard for plaintiff. Wauohop and Cameron v same, claim £3B 5s 6d ; judgment by default, with costs 26s and professional fee £3 39. Mr Izard ;for plaintiff. Strange v same, claim £39 8s 2d; judgment by default, oosts £1 6s, solicitor's fee £3 3s. Mr Izard for plaintiff. Hamilton v Coffey, claim £ll 10s; judgment by default and oosts 19s Board of Conservators v W. L. Allan, olaim £72 Os 9d ; judgment by default for amount claimed and costs £1 18s. Professional fees, £3 3s. John Ohing v Andrew Annie, claim. £lO 15s 2d ; judgment for plaintiff by default, and costs 19s. Margaret Mahoney v John. Mahoney, claim £8 Is Id ; judgment by default with costs lis, and professional fee £1 Is. Mr Izard for plaintiff.