Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE MEMBER FOR ASHLEY DEFENDS HIMSELF.

Mr Moorhouso must have been considerably “riled” by Sir George Grey’s attack on him through interrupting the member for Thames when he addressed the House on the Property Assessment Bill. The member for Ashley is thus reported by the “New Zealand Times”:—“The hon. member for the Thames had often spoken about Wat Tylor, and made his comparisons, but he (the speaker) would sooner compare him to Jack Cade. He had gone to the people, and said ‘follow me, and I will exempt you from all taxation; follow me, and I will be your leader.’ And such leaders had worked nothing but public annoyance. He would exempt nothing—neither rings nor machinery—whatever property was, property ought to pay the tax. What was Murimotu and what was Patetere, but belonging to those who were seized of it. And yet Sir George Grey called it public estate. This laud was the property of the Natives, for whom fcir George in days gone by had so strongly spoken up. What was Murimotu to him (the speaker) ? If the hon. gentleman had any charge to make against him he would challenge him there and then for the appointment of a committee to inquire into it. Ho could not for the life of him tell what brought the hon. gentleman there, for he certainly did nothing to distinguish himself in the eyes of the colony. But ho did what he could to set class against class. Ho was always telling them that the rich were getting richer and the poor poorer ; he was always making charges in general against everybody, but never bringing charges specifically against any. It was a matter of regret to him that the hon. member for the Thames ever emerged from that privacy to which the Crown had relegated him. He had often wished to bring forward a motion to expose the rottenness of certain things in connection with that House, but among those motions there was none he should so much like to bring forward as one to show the rotten ascendancy of the hon, member for the Thames and his parasites.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GLOBE18800916.2.18

Bibliographic details

Globe, Volume XXII, Issue 2048, 16 September 1880, Page 3

Word Count
356

THE MEMBER FOR ASHLEY DEFENDS HIMSELF. Globe, Volume XXII, Issue 2048, 16 September 1880, Page 3

THE MEMBER FOR ASHLEY DEFENDS HIMSELF. Globe, Volume XXII, Issue 2048, 16 September 1880, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert