Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COURT OF APPEAL.

MOORE V. ORFORD. MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS’ CASE (Per Press Association.) WELLINGTON, May 7. The Appeal Court was engaged with tho Nelson case Moore v. Orford. Tho parties arc medical practitioners. Appellant sold his practice at Richmond in 1905 to the respondent, and agreed that he would not practice within eight miles of Richmond. In 1907 appellant went into, partnership with two other medical practitioners'in Nelson, which was within eight- miles, of Richmond, and practised in Nelson for three months. Respondent Qrford brought an action to recover liquidated damages under appellant’s bond, and Judge Cooper, entered up judgment for £3OO. This is an appeal from that decision. Judgment was reserved.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19080508.2.28.10

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2185, 8 May 1908, Page 3

Word Count
111

COURT OF APPEAL. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2185, 8 May 1908, Page 3

COURT OF APPEAL. Gisborne Times, Volume XXVI, Issue 2185, 8 May 1908, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert