LYSNAR v. DUNLOP.
CASE IN THE APPEAL COURT. Press Association. WELLINGTON, last night. The Court of Appeal had to-day a motion before it in Lysnar v. bunion to rescind the leave previously given by the Court to appellant to appeal to the Privy Council, on the ground that the appeal was not diligently pursued. Judgment had been given in July last year, and it was claimed that the appellant had not yet sent Home to England the case on appeal. Messrs. Skerrett, K.C., and Johnston were for the motion, and Messrs. Beuke and Strutt opposed.' . , The defence of appellant was that taking of accounts had not vet beencompleted, and he had been advised by his counsel to delay sending the case Home until accounts had been finally settled. Mr. Bell raised the preliminary objection that the Court of Appeal had no jurisdiction to discharge an order made by it giving leave to appeal to the Privy Council. Argument Is unfinished.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19070717.2.45
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2134, 17 July 1907, Page 2
Word Count
160LYSNAR v. DUNLOP. Gisborne Times, Volume XXV, Issue 2134, 17 July 1907, Page 2
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in