PLIMMER’S ESTATE.
(P®r Press Association.) Wellington, last night. The Appeal Court was oooupied to day with the hearing of the case, Plimmer v. Plimmer. In this case the widow of the fate John Plimmer, who was receiving under a separation order the sum of £l5O annually when Plimmer died (leaving £36,000), had brought an action in the Supreme Court for a further allowance, and the Court awarded her au additional £IOOO. Tho executors now asked the Couit to Bet aside the jugdment, on the ground that tbe Bupreme Court wroDgly exercised itß discretion, as tho widow had already been sufficiently providod for. Argument was concluded in the case Plimmer y. Plimmer. Dr, Findlay appeared on behalf of respondent to uphold the judgment of tbe Supreme Court. The Court of Appeal adjourned at 3 p.m. until 10.30 to morrow.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19060412.2.26
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1722, 12 April 1906, Page 2
Word Count
138PLIMMER’S ESTATE. Gisborne Times, Volume XXII, Issue 1722, 12 April 1906, Page 2
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Gisborne Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in