SUPREME COURT.

Gisborne Times, Volume XIX, Issue 1551, 6 September 1905, Page 2

SUPREME COURT.

81-ANNUAL SITTINGS?.

The half-yearly sittings of the Snprems. Court will oommouoo to morrow morning. before Hia Honor Mr Juetioe Edwards, who arrives from Auckland this afterncun. There are no criminal' oases set down for trial. The cases set down are as fullest! CIVIL CASES. ' James Charles Dunlop-end Emma Dunlop (Mr Albert Devcre) v. William Douglas Lysnar (Mr E. J. Ohrisp). Plaintig asks: (1) That transfers by plaintiff be declared mortgages and not sales; (2) for £750 for losses of mesne profits; (8) for £250 loss' of interest; (4) that defendant be required to render accounts in action of James Ohas. ‘ Dunlop v. Harding and Co-operative Association ; (5) that defendant acoount for use and occupation, and to pay for waste and damages; (6) that accounts be taken of moneys paid by defendant to first mortgagee, aud 6 percent be allowed to defen- } dant; (7) that when aooonnts finally) settled, defendant, upon payment of balance due to him, re-oonvey equity of redemption to plaintiffs free except as to seoond mortgage to plaintiff, E. M. Donlop, and that defendant re-transfer to> . plaintiff, .E, M. Dunlop, seoond mortgage,.'; and pay her interest thereon at 6 per cent from September 10th, 1898. . , , Joseph John Eogera (Mr J. W. Nolan) v. William Thomas Eogsra (Mr J. Blair),* for dissolution of partnership. Greaosn Joseph Blaok (Mr J. W. Nolan) ’ v. William Tombleson (Mr V. Barker);, claim £772 damages for non-delivery of sheep, which plaintiff alleged had been agreed to be sold. Ernest Robert Parnell (Mr J. Blair) v. William Maokrell and John Colley (Mr J. W. Nolan), claim under the “ Employers Liability Aot," damages, etc., for injurie# received while in the employ of defendants, (a) £4OO for phyaioal injuries and shock lb the system, (b) £27- 10s iu respect o! wages, (o) £SO for medioal and dental attendance, and extra nourishment and attendance. i

IN CHAMBERS. , I Mary Valentine Evans, deceased, letters of administration, Mr J. Blair anil j oitor, » «ti m A iS D , i9 Hams ' deceased, probate, Mr J. . I W. Nolan to appeal. i DIVORCE. I n 5£ a i y Elizabeth Bmitb, petitioner (Mr ? *'^/ 8^ r i v^ fabo ' tsford Smith - wspon. ( o^iL J ny RnD, ' aßkiDgorderf “^ y * r i Lister, petitionerfMr H. TO^’, nD r. V ' Bdith lister, respondent, and S“o c “Sl‘”' IN BANCO. ;| Johan. Person (Mr H. J. Finn) v. W. A. t JuT her < •PPHeatlon for a, writ of prohibition to prohibit farther proceeding, in respect of a oonviotion off the said Johan Person on the 21st My*' S°» b , aad James Bobh, appeli-„ Phi nnH r pu aton ooleman > v..Lysaghfl' Ph lpott Bullen, respondent (Mr J. W. F,toi,v.r “ m a ““ o, ‘ _ Emma Mary Dunlop, appellant, v. W. TV Lysnar respondent, appeal against ths Magistrate s decision in regard to reepond. advanteT 0r 6891 80rvio " acd raoDo »'

BANKRUPTCY. Alfred Bachelor (Mr H. J. Ron* andP Oeorge Henry Humphreys and Kenneth Henry Humphreys (Mr E. J. Chrisp), ap»plwatloo for diaohatge, B