Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL COURT.

WAINGAKOMIA CASES. Per Press Association. - Wellington, Inst night. Tho Court of Appoai considered the question of the coßfcs to bo allowed to the Assets Company in the threo oases brought by natives, io which tho decisions of the Court were recently reversed by the Privy Council. After hearing Mr Bell and Mr Deljaukour, for the Company, and Mr Bees for the natives, tho Court allowed the Company £7OO, the same oosis as had been previously allowed against thorn, and disbursements to oovor all oases in the Supreme Court, and costs on tho highest scale in the Court of Appoai iu each caso. The Coutt abo dooided that the Company was not entitled to internet on the costs previously paiij by it, and a refund of whioh it is now entitled to. The Court made a further order on oertain minor points.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19050629.2.33

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume XVIII, Issue 1493, 29 June 1905, Page 4

Word Count
143

APPEAL COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XVIII, Issue 1493, 29 June 1905, Page 4

APPEAL COURT. Gisborne Times, Volume XVIII, Issue 1493, 29 June 1905, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert