Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISOBEYING ORDERS.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CAPTAIN AND CREW.

SOME EXTRAORDINARY STATEMENTS.

By Telegraph—Press Association. Christchurch, last nighl

The differences between the captain and the crew of the American ship Emily Reed, which put into Lyttelton in distress on July 12, came before the Lyttelton Police Court this morning, when nine of the erew appeared on remand to answer a charge of disobeying orders, and Captain Baker, master of the vessel, appeared to answer charges of assault preferred against him by five of the men. The Mayor, Mr W.Radcliffe, was on the Bench.

The men gave evidence that the captain had been more or less under the influence of liquor during the voyage from Hobart, and the chief officer had used a revolver to threaten them. The pumps wero going constantly. When she got inside Lyttelton Heads the men refused to lower a boat to let the oaptain go ashore. They were afraid that if he went ashore he would not come back again, and they absolutely refused duty. When the tugboat had brought the ship in they turned to, when promised that the American Consul wouid see them, but it appears from the crew’s evidence that when the Consul came the men were not given an opportunity to state their case, and the men were looked up in the forecastle. Their rations were biscuits and less each day. It was stated that the donkeyman had waved a hammer in getting them into the forecastle, and the chief mate had pointed a revolver at the door. The chief mate had been in charge when the vessel’s head was turned for Lyttelton, as the ship was considered unsafe.

His Worship dismissed the charges against the captain, and the men were discharged. He said it was for the captain to take what steps he thought fit. Mr Radolffe, in giving judgment in the men’s case, said he considered the ease was one which should have been heard before the Stipendiary Magistrate or a Justice with more knowledge of the sea than he had.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19030725.2.5

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume X, Issue 951, 25 July 1903, Page 2

Word Count
339

DISOBEYING ORDERS. Gisborne Times, Volume X, Issue 951, 25 July 1903, Page 2

DISOBEYING ORDERS. Gisborne Times, Volume X, Issue 951, 25 July 1903, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert