NAPIER LAND CASE.
Per Press Association,, Napier, last night. At the Supreme Court to-day in the hearing of the case, Hamilton v. the Bank of New Zealand Assets Board, the plaintiff’s evidence was practically a reiteration of the statement of claim. O. B. Hoadley, auctioneer, deposed that he had submitted the property to auction in 1899, and that it had been bought in by the Batik. Mr T. XV. Balfour, one of the principal witnesses for tho defence, was unable to give evidence owing to ill health, and it was decided to take his evidence in Wellington. The ease was adjourned to Wellington.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19030519.2.14
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume IX, Issue 895, 19 May 1903, Page 2
Word Count
103NAPIER LAND CASE. Gisborne Times, Volume IX, Issue 895, 19 May 1903, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in