Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHINAMAN’S SLANDER.

VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF.

Per Press Association. Dunedin, last night. The Supreme Court was engaged all day in hearing a case in which Young Ching claimod £5Ol damages frem Kum Fou for alleged slander in repeatodly telling a constablo that plaintiff was suffering from ioprosy, with the result that the constable eventually reported the matter and plaintiff was isolated for several dayß. Plaintiff was a market "gardener at Alexandra, but sold groceries to customers round the district, and was thus to somo extent competing with defendant, who was a general merchant at Alexandra, and on this ground malice was pleaded. , Tho jury found for plaintiff, and a verdict was given for £l2O damages and costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19030218.2.36

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume IX, Issue 829, 18 February 1903, Page 3

Word Count
116

CHINAMAN’S SLANDER. Gisborne Times, Volume IX, Issue 829, 18 February 1903, Page 3

CHINAMAN’S SLANDER. Gisborne Times, Volume IX, Issue 829, 18 February 1903, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert