SENSATIONAL DIVORCE CASE.
WANT DECLARES IDA CONSPIRACY.
PETITIONER SAYS HE WILL PROVE FORGERY, AND PER-
JURY
Telegraph—Press Association—Copyriglil
Received March 12, 11.15 p.m. Sydney, March 12. The Conningham divorce case was continued to-day. Tho cross-examination of Conningham by Mr Jack Want, lasted for a great part of tho day. At the conclusion of tho examination, iu reply to Mr Want’s statement, that he would show to tho judge and jury that this was a conspiracy, petitioner said that the lottors alleged to have passed between him and respondent since the last trial, and which had beon put in as ovidenco, were forgeries. He would, ho said, prove forgery, perjury, seduction and very nearly murder. Tho petitioner called the respondent, whoso examination was not finished when tho court adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19010313.2.22
Bibliographic details
Gisborne Times, Volume V, Issue 61, 13 March 1901, Page 2
Word Count
128SENSATIONAL DIVORCE CASE. Gisborne Times, Volume V, Issue 61, 13 March 1901, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in