Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GREY MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Monday, July Bth.

(Before 11. S. Hawkins, S.M.)

Wickes v. Fricdlandcr and others.— Claim, £Bl 12s 6d. Messrs Wake and Hannan for plaintiff and Mr Murdoch for defendants. This was an action for costs due to M. Hannan by Barrytown No, 2 Mining Company (in liquidation), of _ which defendants were directors, which debt had been assigned to plaintiff. Edmund Wickes, plaintiff, proved that the amount had not been paid, and he was assignee.

George Percy Wake, solicitor, proved sending signed copies 6f bill to each defendant and to the Secretary of the Barrytown Flat Company No. 2, and later a notice of assignment to plaintiff by registered letter. M. Hannan, solicitor, received instructions from Mr J. C. Duncan, director of Barrytown Plat Company No. 2, to act for company. Saw several of the directors at various times. The company had several actions in Warden’s Court and appeals in the District Court, and several communications took 1 place with the Secretary, Mr Stycho. Mot outgoings and drew on company from time to time for amounts duo. When the company started to wind up a full account was rendered, and draft sent for amount due. This draft was hold over on various excuses and was not paid. The company’s property was seized under distress warrant, and I claimed solicitor's lien on titles in my possession. The plaintiff bought properties and afterwards plaintiff bought the debt, paying me the full amount due, and the titles were handed over to his solicitors. Mr Murdoch asked for a nonsuit on the ground that the Magistrate’s Court had no jurisdiction as the matter related to mining, and could only bo adjudicated on in the Warden’s Court, that the solicitor should be appointed under seal, and that titles should not have been handed over to plaintiff. Judgment was reserved.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19010709.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 9 July 1901, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
305

GREY MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 9 July 1901, Page 2

GREY MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 9 July 1901, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert