Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT SITTINGS.

(per press association.)

Wellington, This Day. Justice Edwards was asked at the instance of the Public Trustee to apponion the estate of the late Thomas Banks, farmer of Brookside, Canterbury, valued at about £l4O. Banks was originally married in England and had children by that marriage. There was a separation, and Banks coming to this colony, and his former partner remaining in England, where she re-married. Banks also remarried with a woman who, by a singular coincidence, was of the same name as his first wife, in that her Christian name was Eleanor, and who had been twice previously married, her second husband being of the name Banks. These marriages and intermarriages have produced a crop of claimants, and the court is asked on the construction of the will to decide whether the residue is to be divided into two equal parts, the grandchildren taking one share and the children of the first Eleanor Banks the other. His Honor reserved judgment

Judgment in the case of Johanna Flockton and George Leonard, a suit for the specific performance of which contains some very unusual features, was delivered by Justice Cooper this morning. Plaintiff claimed the performance of an agreement fer sale by defendant to her of a piece of land in Dixon street for £7OO. The case was tried in March, and the defence set up was that the agreement was not sufficient to satisfy the Statute of Frauds and that defendant was so drunk at the time he executed the agreement as to be incapable of understanding its nature and effect. His Honor was of tho opinion as regards the first point, that there was a sufficient agreement within the statute, as to the other defendants witnesses they had in His Honor’s opinion greatly exaggerated Leonard’s cortdition.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19010419.2.34

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 19 April 1901, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
300

SUPREME COURT SITTINGS. Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 19 April 1901, Page 4

SUPREME COURT SITTINGS. Greymouth Evening Star, Volume XXXI, 19 April 1901, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert