Feilding S.M. Court.

Feilding Star, Volume XVI, Issue 257, 3 May 1895, Page 2

Feilding S.M. Court.

. — —9 This Day. (Before Mr Stanford, S.M.) H. S. Munro v. Robt. Taylor; claim £2 10s. Ml- Reade for plaintiff. Judgment for 10s, .£2 having been paid since service of summons, with costs 12s and solicitor's fee ss. 1 M. H. Higgin v. A. L. Parr ; claim Ss 9d. Mr Richmond for plaintiff. Judgment for amount claimed, with costs ss. J. Woulfe, H. Reid, and Jos. Wolfe v. Madden and Co. ; claim £63 14s. Mr Richmond for plaintiffs. Judgment for amount claimed, with costs 80c', and solicitor's fee £2 12s. J. K. Simpson and Co. v. A. and D. 1 Noble ; claim £5 4s 4d Mr Sandilands for plaintiff. Judgment against Alexander Noble for amount claimed, with costs 12s and solicitor's fee 15s 6. Robert Perrett v. W. Bishop ; claim 17a 6d. Mr Sandilauds for plaintiff. Judgment for amount claimed, with costs 15s. E,. Perrett v, D. Sanson ; claim £2 16s 6d. Mr Sandilands for plaintiff. Judgment for amount claimed, with costs ss, I and solicitor's fee ss. R. Perrett v. W. R- "Wilson ; claim £4 9s. Mr Sandilands for plaintiff. Judgment for amount claimed, with costs os solicitor's fee ss.Arnold and Co. v- D. Sanson ; claim 14s 4d. Mr Sandilands for plaintiffs Judgment for amount claimed, with costs 5. J. McColley v. "Warena Hunia ; claim £4 3s 6d. Mr Sandilands for plaintiff. Judgment for amount claimed, with costs 13s 6d and solicitor's fee ss. J. H. Blackmore charged S. Wilson with using abusive language tolbirn in a public place. Mr Richmond, instructed by Mr Prior, appeared for plaintiff, and Mr Sandilands for defendant. Complaintant and H. L. Jackson gave evidence of the alleged abusive language. Mr Richmond asked that accused should be required to find sureties to keep the peace. Defendant denied having used the language alleged. D. Sutherland also gave evidence for the defence. His Worship had no doubt the offence had been committed, but he did not think the offence was in itself a serious one. Defendant would be convicted and fined £1, with costs 9s and solicitor's fee 21s. Police v. Sarah Foster. This was a charge against defendant for allowing six head of cattle to wander and graze in the streets on April 21st. Constable Tuohy conducted the case for the police, and Mr Reade defended. Isaac Ohurcher deposed to seeing the cattle grazing in the street ; his attention was called to the cattle. T. W. K. Foster deposed the cattle were his, The case was dismissed against defendant, and a fresh charge was laid against her husband, T. W. K. Foster, who, on being charged with the offence, pleaded guilty and was fined 2s 6d, with costs 7s. The Court then adjourned.